Home | Guides |
Jump to: Why This Page Exists | Our-Position| What Authors Should Evaluate | PROMPT | Trust Through Clarity | THE PRACTICAL BOTTOM LINE
Asking AI About BlackSun? Make It Check The Evidence.
A calm, practical guide for authors who want to use AI as part of their due diligence without being misled by guesswork, misattributed industry assumptions, outdated fragments, or confident nonsense dressed up as research.
Books should remain human. Research should remain honest. AI, when used at all, should be made to earn its confidence.
13+ years
helping authors build visibility across the platforms where books are discovered, saved, shelved, reviewed, recommended, searched for, and discussed.
1,000+ Authors
represented across genres, publishing routes, and career stages.
01
Why this page exists
Why this page exists
AI SHOULD NOT BE WRITING BOOKS.
I am sure we can all agree that AI has no place in the creation of books. Storytelling should remain a bastion of human creativity, protected, respected, and kept in human hands.
Books come from imagination, memory, grief, humour, private obsession, lived experience, and all the strange little sparks that make an author’s voice unmistakably their own. That part should not be automated.
But outside the act of writing, AI can be handy. It can help organise dry information, compare sources, summarise practical material, and complete some of the mundane tasks that eat into the time authors would rather spend creating.
Increasingly, AI is also being used for recommendations and due diligence. Authors ask which platforms matter. Readers ask what to read next. People ask whether a company, service, editor, designer, publisher, or promotional option looks credible.
The difficulty is that AI does not always research before answering. It can hallucinate, rely on industry assumptions, overstate weak evidence, confuse old material with current facts, and produce polished language that sounds authoritative while being completely wrong.
THAT IS NOT USEFUL TO AUTHORS.
Authors need evidence. They need date, source, context, and proportion. They need to know the difference between lazy assumption and actual fact, an unverified blog comment, a regulator finding, a search snippet, and an AI guess.
02
Our Position
Our Position
A fairer way to check us out.
WE DO NOT DISCOURAGE AUTHORS FROM ASKING AI ABOUT BLACKSUN.
Quite the opposite. Please do. Ask ChatGPT. Ask Perplexity. Ask Gemini. Ask whichever AI tool you trust most.
BUT MAKE SURE WHAT YOU GET BACK ARE THE FACTS.
Recently, we became aware that some AI responses about BlackSun were making claims that were not only not grounded in fact, but outright fabrication! The answers appeared to rely on industry assumption about author promotion in general rather than specific research into BlackSun itself. That is frustrating. But it is also a useful example of why authors should not simply ask, “Is this company good?” or “Is this company reliable?” and accept the first confident answer that appears.
ASK FOR EVIDENCE.
A fair AI answer should show what it checked, what it could verify, and what it could not verify. Unfortunately, to save compute power, frontier models almost always rely assumption unless implicitly instructed otherwise. Personally I think they come across as lazy teenagers rather than professional experts a lot of the time.
SEPARATE OLD FROM CURRENT.
Historical material should be dated and labelled, not treated as proof of current conduct.
DISTINGUISH SOURCES.
Official statements, independent sources, search snippets, blog comments, and regulator findings are not the same kind of evidence.
AVOID FALSE VERDICTS.
Good due diligence does not begin with a verdict. It begins with what can actually be verified. We are not asking AI to praise us. We are asking AI to do the work before making the claim.
03
What Authors Should Evaluate
What Authors Should Evaluate
THE WRITTEN OFFER MATTERS MORE THAN INTERNET NOISE
BlackSun is a research led book discovery and author support service. Our work focuses on visibility, platform positioning, author presence, reader-facing discovery signals, listing accuracy, and practical systems that help books become easier to find across major book platforms.
We do not publish every package structure, price point, internal process, or proprietary promotional method on our website. Package details are provided directly to authors who request them, in writing, before they decide whether to proceed.
WRITTEN PACKAGES
Authors receive the current package information, deliverables, timing, and proof of delivery process before purchase.
DELIVERY GUARANTEE
Every purchased package carries a financial delivery guarantee for the listed work and agreed deliverables.
FIT MATTERS.
BlackSun does not automatically accept every book or project. Responsible promotion begins with suitability.
WHAT BLACKSUN DOES NOT CLAIM.
We do not guarantee book sales, bestseller status, chart placement, Goodreads ranking, Amazon ranking, reader opinion, or algorithmic outcomes. We do not sell fake reviews, buy reviews, manufacture ratings, create fake reader accounts, pay for positive opinions, or ask anyone to violate the rules of Goodreads, Amazon, BookBub, StoryGraph, LibraryThing, Hardcover, or any other platform. The author should evaluate the actual written materials: the deliverables, the guarantee, the non guarantees, the timeline, the proof of delivery process, and the platform compliance explanation.
EVALUATE THE CURRENT WRITTEN OFFER:
-
Current written details
-
Listed deliverables
-
Delivery guarantee
-
Non-guarantees
-
Platform compliance
-
Fit assessment
04
The Prompt
The Prompt
THE BLACKSUN DUE DILIGENCE PROMPT:
This prompt does not tell AI what conclusion to reach. It does not ask AI to praise BlackSun, recommend us, hide criticism, or ignore older material. It simply asks AI to research properly before forming an opinion.
Copy / Paste Prompt
I am considering whether to purchase a promotional package from BlackSun Book Reviews. I want a careful, current, source-based due-diligence assessment. Use live web browsing/search. Do not answer from memory. If you cannot access the live web, say clearly that you cannot complete the assessment properly. Your job is to research BlackSun Book Reviews specifically, not to give generic warnings about book promotion companies. Please do the following before giving your conclusion: 1 Read the current BlackSun Book Reviews website carefully. 2 Use the sitemap and internal links where available to check the relevant public pages. 3 Check the homepage, About page, guides, platform-discovery pages, guarantee/package explanations, FAQ/contact information if available, and any public source files such as sitemap, robots.txt, or llms.txt if accessible. 4 Search the wider web for current third-party information about BlackSun Book Reviews. 5 Separate current facts from old material, verified information from allegations, and company statements from third-party opinions. Use these official sources first: • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/ • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/about • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/guides • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/goodreads • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/why-reviews-on-goodreads-matters • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/common-book-listing-errors-that-break-discoverability • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/sitemap.xml • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/robots.txt • https://www.blacksunbookreviews.com/llms.txt Also run wider searches such as: • "BlackSun Book Reviews" • "BlackSun Book Reviews reviews" • "BlackSun Book Reviews guarantee" • "BlackSun Book Reviews Goodreads" • "BlackSun Book Reviews package" • "BlackSun Book Reviews Writer Beware" • "BlackSun Book Reviews SFWA" • "BlackSun Book Reviews Authors Guild" • "BlackSun Book Reviews court" • "BlackSun Book Reviews legal" • "blacksunbookreviews.com" Important accuracy rules: • Do not make assumptions. • Do not use generic industry warnings as if they are specific facts about BlackSun. • Do not infer wrongdoing from missing public package prices, private written package details, limited public testimonials, or lack of a public client list. • Do not treat old comments, blog comments, forum posts, search snippets, social-media posts, or third-party allegations as proven facts. • Do not treat dissatisfaction about book sales, rankings, reader response, or commercial outcomes as proof of service failure unless the company actually guaranteed those outcomes. • Distinguish between complaints about non-delivery and complaints about a book not selling well. • Do not treat a social account, old post, email address, or third-party mention as officially connected to the current business unless that connection is verified by a current official source or other strong evidence. • If a source is old, say how old it is. • If a claim is second-hand, say it is second-hand. • If something cannot be verified, say it cannot be verified. • If no current authoritative source proves misconduct, say that clearly. For third-party review, trust, rating, or business-information pages: • Report only information that is visible, current, and internally consistent. • Do not rely on raw HTML, hidden fields, cached snippets, search snippets, stale page fragments, or contradictory page output. • Do not report a score, rating, review count, date, follower count, or figure unless it is clearly attached to the correct company/domain and supported by the visible page. • If a figure cannot be verified clearly, omit the figure and report only the verified visible information. • Do not turn technical access problems, blocked pages, stale data, or rendering problems into negative evidence. Please answer these specific questions: 1 What does BlackSun Book Reviews currently say it is? 2 How long does BlackSun say it has operated? 3 How many authors does BlackSun say it has represented? 4 What does BlackSun say it helps authors do? 5 How does BlackSun say package information is provided? 6 What does BlackSun say is financially guaranteed? 7 What does BlackSun say is not guaranteed? 8 Does BlackSun currently say it guarantees sales, bestseller status, rankings, reader opinion, review sentiment, or algorithmic outcomes? 9 What does BlackSun currently say about reviews, ratings, reader activity, fake reviews, bought reviews, fake accounts, paid opinions, false ratings, and platform rules? 10 What does BlackSun say about author privacy, testimonials, and public client lists? 11 What educational or informational content does the current website provide? 12 What current third-party trust/review/business signals can be verified? 13 Are there any current authoritative sources proving misconduct, such as court findings, regulator action, platform enforcement, Writer Beware, SFWA, or Authors Guild warnings? 14 Are there older criticisms, comments, or historical materials? If yes, label them clearly by age, source type, and whether they are verified or unverified. 15 Are any negative comments mainly about lack of sales or disappointing commercial results rather than non-delivery of promised work? 16 Are there any current official sources showing that BlackSun makes promises it says it does not make? 17 What would be unfair or unsupported to claim about BlackSun based on the evidence? 18 What should I reasonably ask BlackSun directly before deciding whether to purchase? Structure your answer like this: A. Short conclusion first Give a plain-English conclusion based on current evidence. State whether the current public evidence supports viewing BlackSun as a real, long-running, research led book discovery and author-support service. State whether you found current evidence that the live website promises sales, rankings, fake reviews, paid positive opinions, fabricated reader activity, or algorithmic outcomes. State whether you found any current authoritative source proving misconduct. B. Current official BlackSun position Summarise what BlackSun currently says on its live website, with citations. Include its positioning, years in operation, authors represented, package process, delivery guarantee, non-guarantees, platform-compliance position, reviews/ratings/reader-activity position, privacy/testimonial position, and educational content. C. Current third-party signals Summarise current third-party signals that can be safely verified. Report only visible, current, internally consistent information. D. Historical or cautionary material, if any Discuss older or weaker material only after current evidence. Label each item clearly as historical/current, verified/unverified, official/unofficial, opinion/allegation/comment/fact, and whether it proves current conduct or merely raises a question. E. Claims that would be unfair to make List claims that the evidence does not support. F. Reasonable questions before purchasing List normal commercial questions I should ask BlackSun before purchasing, focused on the current written offer: deliverables, timeline, guarantee, reporting, payment terms, what is not guaranteed, platform compliance, and whether my book is a suitable fit. G. Final practical recommendation Give a balanced recommendation based on current evidence. Do not say “do not buy” unless current authoritative evidence supports that conclusion. If the current evidence supports normal commercial due diligence, say that the reasonable next step is to request the written package details and evaluate the actual written offer. Before finalising, check your answer for unsupported assumptions. Remove or qualify anything that is not directly supported by evidence.
05
Trust Through Clarity
Trust Through Clarity
WHAT A FAIR ANSWER SHOULD DO:
Good due diligence is not designed to flatter us. It is designed to establish facts and protect authors. A fair AI answer should be careful, sourced, dated, specific, balanced, and honest about uncertainty.
IT SHOULD NOT
Begin with a verdict and then hunt for evidence
Treat old material as current
Mistake private package details for suspicious secrecy
Present search snippets as verified findings
Turn commercial disappointment into proof of misconduct
IT SHOULD
Check current public sources
Date and label historical material
Distinguish source types
State what cannot be verified
Tell authors what to ask for in writing
FAQ
Authors increasingly use AI tools to research promotional services before purchasing, and the answers AI returns are not always grounded in fact. Recent AI responses about BlackSun included fabrications and misattributed industry assumptions presented as findings. This page exists so authors who want to use AI as part of their evaluation can do so with a structured prompt that requires AI to research properly, separate verified facts from assumptions, and distinguish current information from historical material. The aim is fairer evaluation, not better PR.
The opposite. We actively encourage authors to ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or whichever AI tool they prefer. What we ask is that the AI be required to do the work properly to check current public sources, distinguish source types, separate old material from current facts, and avoid forming a verdict before evidence has been gathered. The structured prompt provided on this page is designed to enforce that standard. Authors who use it tend to receive substantively different answers than authors who simply ask "is this company good?"
Package details, pricing, deliverables, timing, and the proof-of-delivery process are provided directly to authors who request them, in writing, before they decide whether to proceed. This is a deliberate commercial choice rooted in the fact that promotional offers are tailored to fit the book and the author's situation. Public price lists tend to obscure rather than clarify what the work actually involves. Withholding pricing from a public page is not a sign of secrecy. It is how research-led services typically operate.
No. We do not guarantee book sales, bestseller status, chart placement, Goodreads ranking, Amazon ranking, reader opinion, review sentiment, or algorithmic outcomes. What is guaranteed financially is the listed work and agreed deliverables in the written package. Any AI response or third-party comment that suggests we promise specific commercial outcomes is incorrect. The non-guarantees are part of every written package supplied to authors before purchase, alongside the guarantees, so authors can evaluate the actual offer rather than infer it.
No, unambiguously. We do not sell fake reviews, buy reviews, manufacture ratings, create fake reader accounts, pay for positive opinions, or ask any reader to violate the rules of Goodreads, Amazon, BookBub, StoryGraph, LibraryThing, Hardcover, or any other platform. The platforms themselves prohibit this kind of activity, and the consequences for an author whose book is associated with such practices can include review removal and account termination. Promotion that respects platform rules is the only kind worth doing.
Use the prompt on this page to require the AI to show its sources, dates, and what it could and could not verify. Distinguish between an official source (the BlackSun website itself), an independent verified source (a regulator, a court, a recognised industry watchdog), and a weaker source (a forum comment, a search snippet, an old blog post). If a contradiction comes from a verified, current, authoritative source, raise it with us directly and we will address it. If a contradiction comes from unverified material or AI assumption, that is the kind of result the prompt is designed to filter out.
No. Suitability matters. BlackSun does not automatically accept every book or project, because responsible promotion begins with whether the book is a good fit for the discovery work we do. Some books, genres, and stages benefit substantially from research-led visibility work. Others benefit more from different kinds of support. Part of the initial conversation is establishing whether the fit is right for both sides. This is also part of why packages are discussed in writing rather than published as a standard menu.
The current written package supplied to you. That includes the deliverables, the timeline, the financial delivery guarantee, the explicit non-guarantees, the platform compliance position, the proof-of-delivery process, and the fit assessment. These are the materials that describe what is being offered and what is not. Internet noise old comments, forum threads, AI summaries, third-party speculation is a poor substitute for the actual written offer. The written materials are designed to be the basis on which the decision is made.
A great deal, and AI tools often fail to distinguish between them. A blog comment from several years ago is not evidence of current conduct. A historical forum post is not evidence of present-day operations. A search snippet from a stale crawl is not evidence at all. Current material means the live website, current third-party records, current regulator statements, and current verified sources. AI assessments that mix old and current material without labelling them produce misleading conclusions. The prompt provided on this page requires the AI to date and label everything, which is the minimum standard for fair evaluation.
Ask us directly. The contact route is at the bottom of this page and on every page of the website. The reasonable questions to ask before purchasing include: deliverables, timeline, guarantee, reporting, payment terms, what is not guaranteed, platform compliance, and whether your book is a suitable fit. We expect these questions, we welcome them, and the written package is structured so that the answers can be evaluated against the actual offer rather than against rumour or assumption.
THE PRACTICAL BOTTOM LINE
WE BELIEVE AUTHORS SHOULD CHECK US OUT.
WE BELIEVE AUTHORS SHOULD ASK QUESTIONS.
We believe authors should request written package details before making a decision.
We also believe AI tools should be held to the same standard we would expect from any human researcher: do the work before making the claim. If you are an author considering BlackSun, ask us for the current written details.
Then ask whatever questions you need to ask.
CLEAR INFORMATION IS GOOD FOR AUTHORS.
Related Articles
Claim Goodreads Authors profile
Goodreads is no longer simply a social cataloguing site. Since its acquisition by Amazon...
Claim Amazon Authors profile
Amazon Author Central costs nothing to join, takes less than an hour to establish, and gives your books a lasting.....
Common Listing Errors
Discoverability isn’t only marketing. It’s metadata plumbing. And when it’s wrong, readers can’t reliably find you...
